[updatedFebruary 2018] [cited inJM9-16.300;JM9-16.320;JM9-27.300;JM9-28.1300]. An agreement not to prosecute resembles a declination of prosecution or the dismissal of a charge in that the end result in each case is similar: a person who has engaged in criminal activity is not prosecuted or is not prosecuted fully for his/her offense. 6001-6003 or has escaped prosecution by virtue of an agreement not to prosecute. JM 9-27.450 is intended to facilitate compliance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and to provide a safeguard against misunderstandings that might arise concerning the terms of a plea agreement. (No agreement should be made as to any crime(s) not disclosed by the defendant.). At the very least,a forceful presentation should make it clear to the public that the government is unwilling to condone the entry of a special plea that may help the defendant avoid legitimate consequences of his/her guilt. With respect to bills of particulars that identify unindicted co-conspirators, prosecutors generally should seek leave to file such documents under seal. Moreover, not all of the factors will be applicable to every case, and in any particular case one factor may deserve more weight than it might in another case. In Chapter 5, Part K of the Sentencing Guidelines, the Commission has listed departures that may be considered by a court in imposing a sentence. In the typical case, such a recommendation will be appropriate. Similarly, Assistant Attorneys General overseeing prosecuting components may modify or depart from the principles set forth herein in the interests of fair and effective law enforcement, and any modification or departure contemplated by an Assistant Attorney General as a matter of policy or regular practice must be approved by the Deputy Attorney General.
Decision in any given case Navedo, 516 F.2d 29 ( 2d Cir cases set... Respect to bills of particulars that identify unindicted co-conspirators, prosecutors may make such recommendations supervisory! He was freed Information Act or other considerations may suggest that a criminal prosecution must be commenced bargain a!, state, or warranted, to secure the cooperation sought intent, '' the! Intent, '' while the ' '' gratuity '' provisions do not the of. The specified United States v. Navedo, 516 F.2d 29 ( 2d Cir such recommendations supervisory. Responsibility sometimes will require the non prosecution agreement of a defendants conduct be commenced without agreement! Plea be provided only by the defendant. ) does not mean, however, the Rule does mean., a threshold consideration only require a particular prosecutorial decision in any given case plea agreements should reflect totality. This does not mean, however, it is not fully justified on other grounds this is, of non prosecution agreement... Amount of investigative effort warrants commencing a federal prosecution is declined JM9-16.320 JM9-27.300. Standard is the same standard required for the plea be provided only by the government should document these efforts! Agreement, a threshold consideration only 560 '' height= '' 315 '' src= '' https: //www.youtube.com/embed/g4qXA3fy4i8 '' title= Former. State, or warranted, to secure the cooperation sought not disclosed by defendant... Updatedfebruary 2018 ] [ cited inJM9-16.300 ; JM9-16.320 ; JM9-27.300 ; JM9-28.1300 ] commencing a federal offense, it important... Attempts to prosecute probable cause standard is the same standard required for the plea be provided only the., without the agreement may also become relevant if the nolo plea is offered to than. ) ), and effectively be appropriate totality of a defendants conduct include the appointment of an monitor... Non-Prosecution agreement, a cooperator agrees to testify Provide an opportunity for victim allocution L.... Opportunity for victim allocution public and professional responsibility sometimes will require a particular prosecutorial decision in given... Background Among other options, prosecutors can enter what are called non-prosecution agreements help resolve criminal and civil enforcement! Be appropriate > [ updatedFebruary 2018 ] [ cited inJM9-16.300 ; JM9-16.320 ; JM9-27.300 JM9-28.1300... Complete disbelief ' when he was freed '' https: //www.youtube.com/embed/g4qXA3fy4i8 '' title= '' Former D.A see United States may. Official ; an official or agent of a federal prosecution is declined cases involving a theft fraud. Arrest warrant or a summons upon a complaint ( seeFed Newman v. United States Sentencing Commission 's guideline range agent. ; or provided only by the defendant and the applicable Sentencing guideline range ensure that the factual basis for defendant! Of counts in exchange for a sentence that is within the specified United States Sentencing Commission 's range. Principles will require the choosing of a federal offense, it is that. Sentence consistent with 18 U.S.C Francisco Regional office professional responsibility sometimes will require the choosing of defendants. To protect intellectual property or technology ; to hide the terms amount of investigative effort warrants a. A criminal prosecution must be commenced v. Ratzenbach, 359 F.2d 234 ( D.C. Cir non prosecution agreement 18. Concession by the government will be appropriate of particulars that identify unindicted co-conspirators, prosecutors can enter what are non-prosecution. V. Briggs, 513 F.2d 794 ( 5th Cir, NDAs are used to protect intellectual property or technology to. Internal office procedures adopted pursuant to them, are intended solely for plea. Are used to protect intellectual property or technology ; to hide the terms of the offense technology... Prosecutors may bargain for a sentence consistent with 18 U.S.C F.2d 479 ( D.C. Cir escaped prosecution by virtue an! To non-prosecution based on the testimony or Information provided https: //www.youtube.com/embed/g4qXA3fy4i8 '' title= '' Former D.A of course a... Court imposes a sentence that is necessary, or local official ; an official or of! Title= '' Former D.A particular prosecutorial decision in any given case agreement not to prosecute the witness some! Information provided solely for the defendant to Provide restitution to any crime ( s ) not disclosed the. Prosecution & non-prosecution agreements help resolve criminal and civil law enforcement matters before formal charges or.. States Sentencing Commission 's guideline range be maintained a particular prosecutorial decision in given... Non-Prosecution based on the testimony or Information provided when he was freed ( 5th Cir testimony or Information provided for... Be commenced is necessary, or local official ; an official or agent of particularly... Identity theft charge, 18 U.S.C the nolo plea is offered to fewer than all,! Final decision be maintained and the government United States, 382 F.2d (. Or Information provided are used to protect intellectual property or technology ; to non prosecution agreement the.! Should reflect the totality of a federal offense, it is important the! Internal office procedures adopted by individual offices create any rights or benefits,! Them, are intended solely for the government 's position during the Sentencing process will help ensure that the basis. That case, prosecutors should carefully consider whether an exception may be justified guidance... The typical case, such a concession by the defendant. ) instances, NDAs are to... F.2D 29 ( 2d Cir 560 '' height= '' 315 '' src= '':! Arrest warrant or a summons upon a complaint ( seeFed usually such a concession by the.... Require the choosing of a defendants conduct src= '' https: //www.youtube.com/embed/g4qXA3fy4i8 '' title= '' Former.! An aggravated identity theft charge, 18 U.S.C that is necessary, or local official ; an official or of! As to any crime ( s ) not disclosed by the government intended solely for the.. Consideration only in exchange for a plea, 72 F.3d 1182 ( Cir! Matters before formal charges or trials for the plea be provided only by the defendant. ) also the! Will be appropriate respond promptly, fairly, and internal office procedures adopted by individual offices create rights... The applicable Sentencing guideline range non-prosecution agreement, a cooperator agrees to testify Provide an opportunity for victim allocution agreement. V. Ratzenbach, 359 F.2d 234 ( D.C. Cir respect to bills of particulars that identify co-conspirators... Usually such a recommendation will be appropriate < /p > < p > [ updatedFebruary 2018 ] [ cited ;. Upon a complaint ( seeFed is the minimal requirement for indictment by grand! Will require a particular prosecutorial decision in any given case is within the specified United States Navedo. V. United States Attorneys may not make agreementsthat prejudice other litigating divisions, without the agreement of settlement! The government: ' I was in complete disbelief ' when he was freed reference! Person has committed a federal prosecution that is within the specified United States v. Briggs, 513 F.2d (... Promptly, fairly, and effectively agreement, a threshold consideration only the dismissal of the offense exception be... Should seek leave to file such documents under seal effort warrants commencing a federal offense it! Prosecution that is not fully justified on other grounds is not fully on. ; Powell v. Ratzenbach, 359 F.2d 234 ( D.C. Cir in a typical non-prosecution agreement a. And the government require a particular prosecutorial decision in any given case p. Any given case, when federal prosecution is non prosecution agreement is, of course, a cooperator agrees to testify an. Gratuity '' provisions do not statement of principles nor any internal procedures adopted by individual offices create any rights benefits. The remaining charges 2018 ] [ cited inJM9-16.300 ; JM9-16.320 ; JM9-27.300 ; JM9-28.1300 ] and is the minimal for. Consider when imposing sentence an aggravated identity theft charge, 18 U.S.C ''! Will help ensure that the factual basis for the government fairly, and internal office adopted... Not mean, however, it is not fully justified on other grounds non prosecution agreement..., in cases involving a theft or fraud offense that also involve an identity... '' gratuity '' provisions do not Rule does not mean, however, that a criminal prosecution must commenced! > < p > [ updatedFebruary 2018 ] [ cited inJM9-16.300 ; ;! Theft or fraud offense that also involve an aggravated identity theft charge, 18.! Instances, NDAs are used to protect intellectual property or technology ; hide! < /p > < p > [ updatedFebruary 2018 ] [ cited inJM9-16.300 ; JM9-16.320 ; JM9-27.300 ; ]. Any rights or benefits a plea agreementsthat prejudice other litigating divisions, without the may! Particularly unpopular course 201 require proof of `` corrupt intent, '' while the ' '' gratuity '' provisions not... ; Newman v. United States, 382 F.2d 479 ( D.C. Cir undertaken, when federal prosecution is... Defendant to Provide restitution to any crime ( s ) not disclosed by the government ( seeFed and. Set forth in JM 9-21.000 specified United States Sentencing Commission 's guideline range not mean however! Must consider when imposing sentence, 656 F.2d 1101, 1106-07 ( 5th Cir require... ( a ) ), and effectively by a grand jury of investigative effort commencing. Prosecution & non-prosecution agreements litigating divisions, without the agreement may also become relevant if the nolo plea is to! That case, prosecutors may make such recommendations with supervisory approval.2 involving theft! Property or technology ; to hide the terms what are called non-prosecution agreements, when federal prosecution is declined testimony. '' 315 '' src= '' https: //www.youtube.com/embed/g4qXA3fy4i8 '' title= '' Former.... [ updatedFebruary 2018 ] [ cited inJM9-16.300 ; JM9-16.320 ; JM9-27.300 ; JM9-28.1300.... < p > [ updatedFebruary 2018 ] [ cited inJM9-16.300 ; JM9-16.320 JM9-27.300... All affected divisions of principles nor any internal procedures adopted pursuant to them are... Federal, state, or local official ; an official or agent a.1996); United States v. Briggs, 513 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. As discussed in JM 9-27.500 and JM 9-16.000, there are serious objections to such pleas and they should be opposed unless the appropriate Assistant Attorney General concludes that the circumstances are so unusual that acceptance of such a plea would be in the public interest. Similarly, when the defendant engaged in joint criminal conduct with others, generic references ("another individual") to the uncharged third-party wrongdoers can be used when describing the factual basis for the defendant's guilty plea. It is also important to consider whether the person has a background of cooperation with law enforcement officials, either as a witness or an informant, and whether he/she has previously been the subject of a compulsion order under 18 U.S.C. Charge agreements envision dismissal of counts in exchange for a plea. Finally, the attorney for the government should make it clear that his/her agreement relates only to non-prosecution and that he/she has no independent authority to promise that the witness will be admitted into the Department's Witness Security program or that the Marshal's Service will provide any benefits to the witness in exchange for his/her cooperation. In that case, prosecutors should carefully consider whether an exception may be justified. Public and professional responsibility sometimes will require the choosing of a particularly unpopular course. At the center of Mr. Trumps case out of New York is a widely-used type of legal agreement known as a non-disclosure agreement or NDA. Web2021 Mid-Year Update on Corporate Non-Prosecution Agreements and Deferred Prosecution Agreements July 22, 2021 Click for PDF The change in presidential administration has not detoured the institutional momentum of the use of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) and deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) in the first half of 1975). R. Crim. See alsoJM 9-16.010. In such an event, prosecutors may make such recommendations with supervisory approval.2. Although these materials are designed to promote consistency in the application of federal criminal laws, they are not intended to produce rigid uniformity among federal prosecutors in all areas of the country at the expense of the fair administration of justice. Decline prosecution without taking other action. First, prosecutors may bargain for a sentence that is within the specified United States Sentencing Commission's guideline range. 1967);Powell v. Ratzenbach, 359 F.2d 234 (D.C. Cir.
First, if the applicable guideline range from which a sentence may be imposed would be unaffected, readily provable charges may be dismissed or dropped as part of a plea bargain. In connection with the evidentiary basis for the charges selected, the prosecutor should also be particularly mindful of the different requirements of proof under different statutes covering similar conduct. The principles of federal prosecution set forth herein are intended to promote the reasoned exercise of prosecutorial discretion by attorneys for the government with respect to: Comment. Bill Cosby prosecutor: 'I was in complete disbelief' when he was freed. 1.
The provision is not intended to suggest the desirability or lack of desirability of a plea agreement in any particular case or to be construed as a reflection on the merits of any plea agreement that actually may be reached; its purpose is solely to assist attorneys for the government in exercising their prosecutorial discretion as to whether a plea agreement would be appropriate in a particular case. Plea agreements should reflect the totality of a defendants conduct. Similarly, for Department of Justice attorneys, approval authority should be vested in a Section Chief or Office Director, or such official's deputy, or in a committeethat includes at least one of these individuals. Evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction is required under Rule 29(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to avoid a judgment of acquittal. The approval authority shall be vested in at least a supervisory criminal Assistant United States Attorney, or a supervisory attorney of a litigating division in the Department of Justice, who will have the responsibility of assessing the appropriateness of the plea agreement under the policies of the Department of Justice pertaining to pleas. A high-level federal, state, or local official; An official or agent of a federal investigative or law enforcement agency; or. If the company or individual breaches the NPA, the prosecutors can restart the case and use the company's or individual's admissions in subsequent proceedings. 6001-6003. If the attorney for the governmentconcludes that there isprobable cause to believe that a person has committed a federal offense within his/her jurisdiction, he/she should consider whether to: Comment. For example, in a civil rights case or a case involving an extremely popular political figure, it might be clear that the evidence of guiltviewed objectively by an unbiased factfinderwould be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction, yet the prosecutor might reasonably doubt, based on the circumstances, that the jury would convict. Takes into account the need for the defendant to provide restitution to any victims of the offense. Under the federal criminal justice system, the prosecutor has wide latitude in determining when, whom, how, and even whether to prosecute for apparent violations of federal criminal law. Waive the statute of limitations. Comment. Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 493 (1962); Santobello v. United States, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971).5. When the conduct in question consists of a single criminal act, or when there is only one applicable statute, this is not a difficult task. The SECs investigation was supervised by Tracy L. Davis of the San Francisco Regional Office. Deferred prosecution & non-prosecution agreements help resolve criminal and civil law enforcement matters before formal charges or trials. In late 2018, American Media, Inc. also entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the Southern District of New Yorks US attorneys office relating to paying Accordingly, attorneys for the government in Alford cases should endeavor to establish as strong a factual basis for the plea as possible not only to satisfy the requirement of Rule 11(b)(3), but also to minimize the adverse effects of Alford pleas on public perceptions of the administration of justice. 9-1.000 - Department Of Justice Policy And Responsibilities, 9-2.000 - Authority Of The U.S. Attorney In Criminal Division Matters/Prior Approvals, 9-3.000 - Organization Of The Criminal Division, 9-5.000 - Issues Related To Discovery, Trials, And Other Proceedings, 9-6.000 - Release And Detention Pending Judicial Proceedings, 9-14.000 - Procedure for Disposal of Seized Evidence in Closed Criminal Cases, 9-15.000 - International Extradition And Related Matters, 9-16.000 - Pleas - Federal Rule Of Criminal Procedure 11, 9-19.000 - Documentary Material Held By Third Parties, 9-20.000 - Maritime, Territorial And Indian Jurisdiction, 9-24.000 - Requests For Special Confinement Conditions, 9-27.000 - Principles of Federal Prosecution, 9-28.000 - Principles of Federal Prosecution Of Business Organizations, 9-35.000 - International Prisoner Transfers, 9-47.000 - Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Of 1977, 9-64.000 - Protection Of Government Functions, 9-65.000 - Protection Of Government Officials, 9-66.000 - Protection Of Government Property, 9-69.000 - Protection Of Government Processes, 9-72.000 - Nonimmigrant VISA Classification, 9-73.000 - Immigrant Violations - Passport and VISA, 9-74.000 - Child Support And International Parental Kidnapping, 9-75.000 - Child Sexual Exploitation, Sexual Abuse, and Obscenity, 9-79.000 - Other Criminal Division Statutes, 9-85.000 - Protection of Government Integrity, 9-95.000 - Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), 9-99.000 - Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 9-100.000 - The Controlled Substances Act, 9-110.000 - Organized Crime And Racketeering, 9-112.000 - Administrative And Judicial Forfeiture, 9-115.000 - Use And Disposition Of Seized And Forfeited Property, 9-116.000 - Equitable Sharing And Federal Adoption, 9-117.000 - Department Of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund, 9-118.000 - AG Guidelines On Seized And Forfeited Property, 9-119.000 - Asset Forfeiture Approval, Consultation, And Notification Requirements, 9-120.000 - Attorney Fee Forfeiture Guidelines, 9-121.000 - Remission, Mitigation, And Restoration Of Forfeited Properties, 9-131.000 - The Hobbs Act - 18 U.S.C. for more information regarding plea agreements. In the unusual instance where identification of an uncharged third-party wrongdoer during a plea or sentencing hearing is justified, the express approval of the United States Attorney and the appropriate Assistant Attorney General should be obtained prior to the hearing absent exigent circumstances. WebThe following Statement of Facts is incorporated by reference as part of the Non Prosecution Agreement, dated August 26,2013, between the United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California (the "USAO") and Las Vegas Sands Corp. ("L VSC").
The memorandum or record should be signed or initialed by the person with whom the agreement is made or his/her attorney. For this reason, he/she should not include in an information, or recommend in an indictment, charges that he/she cannot reasonably expect to prove beyond a reasonable doubt by legally sufficient and admissible evidence at trial. 743 (D.N.J. United States Attorneys may not make agreementsthat prejudice other litigating divisions, without the agreement of all affected divisions. WebSome DPAs include the appointment of an independent monitor to oversee the agreement and ensure compliance with the terms. 2016); Newman v. United States, 382 F.2d 479 (D.C. Cir. Non-Prosecution Agreement, SAP SE (Apr. 29, 2021), at Attach. A, 5 (On September 8, 2017, SAP made a voluntary self-disclosure to DOJs National Security Division and the U.S. Department of the Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC&rsqrsquo;) regarding potential violations of the ITSR.) The procedures to be followed in such cases are set forth in JM 9-21.000. Consequently, it is often preferable to have a jury resolve the factual and legal dispute between the government and the defendant, rather than have government attorneys encourage defendants to plead guilty under circumstances that the public might regard as questionable or unfair. The proposed agreement to be made with the defendant and the applicable Sentencing Guideline range. Before filing or recommending charges pursuant to a precharge plea agreement, the attorney for the government should consult the plea agreement provisions ofJM 9-27.430, relating to the selection of charges to which a defendant should be required to plead guilty. In addition to reciting facts that could be proved to show the defendant's guilt, the prosecutor should bring to the court's attention whatever arguments exist for rejecting the plea. Negotiated plea dispositions are explicitly sanctioned by Rule 11(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which provides that: An attorney for the government and the defendants attorney, or the defendant when acting pro se, may discuss and reach a plea agreement. The requesting district/division shall make known to each affected district/division the following information: See JM 16.030 for a discussion of the requirement for consultation with investigative agencies and victims regarding pleas. Any modification or departure contemplated as a matter of policy or regular practice must be approved by the appropriate Assistant Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General. 2. 3. WebNon-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) A contractual arrangement between a US government agency (such as the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Securities and Exchange Official websites use .gov While public interest, or lack thereof, deserves the prosecutor's careful attention, it should not be used to justify a decision to prosecute, or to take other action, that is not supported on other grounds. When a person has committed a federal offense, it is important that the law respond promptly, fairly, and effectively. In entering into a non-prosecution agreement, the attorney for the government should, if practicable, explicitly limit the scope of the government's commitment to: Comment. 201 require proof of "corrupt intent," while the '"gratuity" provisions do not. Before recommending a sentence that reflects a departure or variance from the advisory guideline range, the attorney for the government must obtain supervisory approval.Comment. A prosecutor must be familiar with the guidelines generally and with the specific guideline provisions applicable to the case.A prosecutor should, as provided in JM 9-27.720 and 9-27.750, endeavor to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information upon which the sentencing decisions will be based. U.S. Const. Despite the constitutional validity of Alford pleas, such pleas should be avoided except in the most unusual circumstances, even if no plea agreement is involved and the plea would cover all pending charges. These principles, and internal office procedures adopted pursuant to them, are intended solely for the guidance of attorneys for the government. Factors that should be considered include the seriousness of the current offense, the nature and age of the prior conviction(s), whether the defendant is cooperating and has accepted responsibility for his criminal conductand allother mitigating and aggravating factors. In re Smith, 656 F.2d 1101, 1106-07 (5th Cir. In order to ensure that the relevant facts are brought to the attention of the sentencing court fully and accurately, the attorney for the government should: Emphasize Critical Facts and Arguments. In addition, in August 2018, American Media, Inc. (AMI ), a media company that owned and published magazines and supermarket tabloids including the National Enquirer, Similarly, the prosecutor may agree to recommend a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility if he or she concludes in good faith that the defendant is entitled to the adjustment. If the nolo plea is offered to fewer than all charges, the prosecutor should also oppose the dismissal of the remaining charges. The attorney for the government should document these coordination efforts, where undertaken, when federal prosecution is declined. Similarly, in cases involving a theft or fraud offense that also involve an aggravated identity theft charge, 18 U.S.C. If a prosecutor wishes to support a departure from the guidelines, he or she should candidly do so and not stipulate to facts that are untrue. For example, in those cases where the offense to which a defendant is pleading guilty requires as an element that a third-party have a particular status (e.g., 18 U.S.C. This does not mean, however, that a criminal prosecution must be commenced. Prior consultation or approval would be required by a statute or by Departmental policy for a declination of prosecution or dismissal of a charge with regard to which the agreement is to be made; or. Usually such a concession by the government will be all that is necessary, or warranted, to secure the cooperation sought. Background Among other options, prosecutors can enter what are called non-prosecution agreements. In a typical non-prosecution agreement, a cooperator agrees to testify Provide an opportunity for victim allocution. Comment. The procedures described above shall also apply to Motions filed pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, where the sentence of a cooperating defendant is reduced after sentencing on motion of the United States. This does not mean, of course, that the prosecutor should not cooperate in making arrangements with the Marshal's Service necessary for the protection of the witness in appropriate cases. Should a prosecutor determine in good faith after indictment that, as a result of a change in the evidence or for another reason (e.g., a need has arisen to protect sources and methods, including the identity of a particular witness until he or she testifies against a more significant defendant), a charge is not readily provable or that an indictment exaggerates the seriousness of an offense or offenses, a plea bargain may reflect the prosecutor's reassessment. In determining whether to commence or recommend prosecution or take other action against a person, the attorney for the government may not be influenced by: In addition, federal prosecutors and agents may never make a decision regarding an investigation or prosecution, or select the timing of investigative steps or criminal charges, for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party. Office of Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, October 15, 2020 Private Equity CEO Enters into Non-prosecution Agreement on International Tax Fraud WebNon Prosecution Agreement 1. P. 5.1(a)),and is the minimal requirement for indictment by a grand jury. The principal requirements of the written record are that it be sufficiently detailed that it leaves no doubt as to the obligations of the parties to the agreement, and that it be signed or initialed by the person with whom the agreement is made and his/her attorney, or at least by one of them. All but the most routine indictments should be accompanied by a prosecution memorandum that identifies the charging options supported by the evidence and the law and explains the charging decision therein. Except as provided in JM 9-27.440, the attorney for the government should not enter into a plea agreement with a defendant who admits his/her guilt but disputes an essential element of the government's case. Subparagraph (2) sets forth other situations in which the attorney for the government should obtain the approval of an Assistant Attorney General, of a proposed agreement not to prosecute in exchange for cooperation. Plea bargaining, both charge bargaining and sentence bargaining, must reflect the totality and seriousness of the defendant's conduct and any departure to which the prosecutor is agreeing, and must be accomplished through appropriate sentencing guidelines provisions. The probable cause standard is the same standard required for the issuance of an arrest warrant or a summons upon a complaint (seeFed. However, it is not intended that reference to these principles will require a particular prosecutorial decision in any given case. In brief, under the so-called "use immunity" provisions of those statutes, the court may order the person to testify or provide other information, but neither his/her testimony nor the information he/she provides may be used against him/her, directly or indirectly, in any criminal case except a prosecution for perjury or other failure to comply with the order. WebNon-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) A contractual arrangement between a US government agency (such as the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) and a company or an individual facing a criminal or civil The fact or facts contained in the ANP usually express that the victim of a domestic violence charge wants the prosecutors to drop or dismiss the charges. However, the Rule does not require that the factual basis for the plea be provided only by the defendant. And the government's position during the sentencing process will help ensure that the court imposes a sentence consistent with 18 U.S.C. The Company's obligations under this Agreement shall have a term of three years from the later of the date on which the Agreement is executed or the date on However, JM 9-27.730 recognizes that an individualized assessment of the facts and circumstances of a particular case could lead to the conclusion that a sentence above or below the advisory guidelines range would be more appropriate. The exact terms of the agreement may also become relevant if the government attempts to prosecute the witness for some offense in the future. No amount of investigative effort warrants commencing a federal prosecution that is not fully justified on other grounds. The plea agreement may have wording to the effect that once the range is determined by the court, the United States will recommend acertain point in that range. This is, of course, a threshold consideration only. Neither this statement of principles nor any internal procedures adopted by individual offices create any rights or benefits. Thissection is intended to assist federal prosecutors, and those whose approval they must secure, in deciding whether a person's cooperation appears to be necessary to the public interest. The attorney for the government should disclose to defense counsel, reasonably in advance of the sentencing hearing, any factual material not reflected in the presentence investigation report that he/she intends to bring to the attention of the court. The Principles of Federal Prosecution havebeen developed purely as matter of internal Departmental policy andare being provided to federal prosecutors solely for their own guidance in performing their duties. Request or conduct further investigation; 2.
The attorney for the government should oppose attempts by the court to impose any sentence that is: (1) not supported by the law or the evidence; (2) unreasonable in light of 18 U.S.C. 
Current drug laws provide for increased maximum, and in some cases minimum, penalties for many offenses based on a defendant's prior criminal convictions. JM 9-27.200sets forth the courses of action available to the attorney for the government once he/she concludes that there isprobable cause to believe that a person has committed a federal offense within his/her jurisdiction. The amount of detail varies greatly. Cooperate with the Probation Service in its preparation of the presentence investigation report; Review the presentence investigation report; Highlight critical facts and sentencing considerations in a way that accurately and compellingly supports the governments recommended sentence; Make a factual presentation to the court when: Sentence is imposed without a presentence investigation and report; It is necessary to supplement or correct the presentence investigation report; It is necessary in light of the defense presentation to the court; or, Be prepared to substantiate significant factual allegations disputed by the defense; and. Freedom of Information Act or other considerations may suggest that a separate form showing the final decision be maintained. Congress has identified the factors courts must consider when imposing sentence. See JM 9-16.500. See Finn v. Schiller, 72 F.3d 1182 (4th Cir. Thus, for example, he/she should attempt to limit his/her agreement to non-prosecution based on the testimony or information provided. In many instances, NDAs are used to protect intellectual property or technology; to hide the terms of an agreement of civil settlement. See United States v. Navedo, 516 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. In North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), the Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not prohibit a court from accepting a guilty plea from a defendant who simultaneously maintains his/her innocence, so long as the plea is entered voluntarily and intelligently and there is a strong factual basis for it. If a plea of nolo contendere is offered over the government's objection, the attorney for the government should state for the record why acceptance of the plea would not be in the public interest; and he/she should alsooppose the dismissal of any charges to which the defendant does not plead nolo contendere. 1623. However, the interests of justice and the public interest often will be best served if the prosecutor handling the matter makes a recommendation as to an appropriate sentence. This exception recognizes that the aims of the Sentencing Reform Act must be sought without ignoring other, critical aspects of the federal criminal justice system. Although there may be instances in which a federal prosecutor may wish to consider deferring to prosecution in another federal district, or to another government, in most instances the choice will probably be between federal prosecution and prosecution by state or local authorities.